CAPRIE (Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events)
was a randomized, blinded clinical trial of 19,185 patients from 384 centers in 16
countries to assess the potential benefit of clopidogrel (75 mg) compared with aspirin (325 mg)
in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or vascular death in patients with recent ischemic stroke,
recent MI, or peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
11
-
Recent MI [ ≤ 35 days] with chest pain ≥ 20 minutes, increased
cardiac enzymes or ECG changes.
-
Recent ischemic stroke (≥1 week and ≤6 months) with neurologic deficit of
atherosclerotic origin, neurologic signs persisting for ≥1 week, and CT or MRI to rule out hemorrhage.
-
Established PAD, defined as either
intermittent claudication of presumed atherosclerotic origin and ankle brachial
index ≤0.85, or history of intermittent claudication with previous leg amputation,
reconstructive surgery, or angioplasty.
Efficacy
The results of the CAPRIE trial established PLAVIX (clopidogrel bisulfate) as more effective than
aspirin in reducing the combined risk of MI, ischemic stroke, and vascular death in patients with
atherosclerotic vascular disease.
1 In the CAPRIE trial, PLAVIX demonstrated an 8.7% (P=0.045)
relative risk reduction compared to aspirin in the combined end points of MI,
ischemic stroke, and vascular death.
18
Although the statistical significance favoring clopidogrel bisulfate (PLAVIX®) over aspirin
was marginal (P=0.045, based on overall incidence of primary outcome events: 9.78%
for clopidogrel vs 10.64% for aspirin), and represents the result of a single trial that has
not been replicated, the comparator drug, aspirin, is itself effective (vs placebo)
in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with recent MI or recent stroke.
Thus, the difference between clopidogrel and placebo, although not measured directly, is substantial.
13

The primary outcome analysis in CAPRIE was based on the composite
end point of MI, ischemic stroke, or vascular death among all randomized patients
(intent-to-treat analysis). Only the first occurrence of these outcomes was counted.
The total number of patients randomized was 9,599 for clopidogrel
bisulfate and 9,586 for aspirin.
13
Results from the CAPRIE trial demonstrated that clopidogrel had a lower event rate per year
compared with aspirin, 5.32% vs 5.83%, respectively, which resulted in an overall
risk reduction of 8.7%
17
(P=0.045)
13 vs aspirin.
The cumulative risk curves separated early and continued to diverge
during the 3-year follow-up period.
13
Safety

Clopidogrel was associated with a 2.0% incidence of GI hemorrhage and 0.7%
incidence of related hospitalizations. The percentage of patients experiencing peptic,
gastric, or duodenal ulcers was 0.7% in the clopidogrel group. Clopidogrel also
was associated with a 0.4% incidence of intracranial hemorrhage.
13
Differences noted above for GI hemorrhage and ulcers occurred despite the
fact that patients who were unable to tolerate aspirin were excluded from the
CAPRIE population.
17
Patients in CAPRIE were intensively monitored for neutropenia. The observed frequency
of severe neutropenia (<450 neutrophils/microliter) was 0.04% (4 patients) with clopidogrel
and 0.02% (2 patients) with aspirin. One of the four clopidogrel patients was receiving
cytotoxic chemotherapy; another recovered and returned to the trial after temporary
interruption of treatment with clopidogrel. Although the risk of myelotoxicity with
clopidogrel thus appears to be quite low, this possibility should be considered when a
patient receiving clopidogrel demonstrates fever or other sign of infection.
12

Compared with aspirin, the incidence of GI disturbances including abdominal pain,
dyspepsia, and gastritis was lower in the clopidogrel group.
17
Compared with aspirin, clopidogrel was associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea,
rash, pruritus, and purpura (most often described as "bruising").
11
The discontinuation rate due to adverse GI events was 3.2% with clopidogrel and 4.0% with
aspirin.
13